If you do then could you elaborate on the difference when the main yoke is made with and without Permendur? Would it be the need to make the main yoke from Permendur of would it be the need to make main yoke, pole pieces, the back and forward ways and the field-coil core from the SAME material? Also, if the Feastrex people are the ONLY people who are in position to make this decision then why qualification then have to make those judgment? Who the hell know what Feastrex think or know about sound and what this objectives are. Well, I do not think that he has this experience, nether I do, not many other people.
FEASTREX DRIVERS FOR SALE PLUS
There is a significant, very audible difference in the sound between the two drivers even though the only significant physical difference is the use of all-Permendur in one and Permendur plus Iron in the other. He might recoil at the price, but his ears would not be telling him that there is no significant difference. If Very Knowledgeable Guy ever had an opportunity to do a listening comparison between a Feastrex Type II field coil driver, which has a Fe main yoke with a Fe49–Co49–V2 pole piece and a Fe49–Co49–V2 top plate, and a Feastrex Type III field coil driver, which has yoke, pole piece and top plate all made of Fe49–Co49–V2, he would no longer be laughing. Kharma Speakers as pH-indicator of the worst in Audio. Satisfying result: the RMAF Show + Cogent. Lamm Industries: a special interview with a special com. Home » Audio Discussions » RMAF 2008 observations, opinions 1) ceramic drivers (33 posts, 2 pages)
0 kommentar(er)
